![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
you can count on me
Why are you smoking? I have a particular fondness for small movies that appear to be saying little, if anything, and yet months and years later keep drawing you back to them, revealing more and more truth with each viewing. (Or, as the case may be, each listening; as I spend my hours working, I play movies, and sometimes you collect more from the sounds of a movie than the sights of it.) One of my favorite small movies of the last few years is writer/director Kenneth Lonergan’s You Can Count On Me. You might have missed its two Academy Award nominations in 2001 — Laura Linney for Best Actress, Lonergan for Best Original Screenplay — since that was a Big Movie year; this and other small movies were heavily overshadowed by movies like Erin Brockovich, Traffic and Gladiator. A few weeks ago Susan and I were uninspired by the crop at the box office, so we poked around Borders for something to take back to her place and watch. We were in the middle of packing up her apartment, and desperately needed a break. We ended up watching the old Cary Grant classic Arsenic and Old Lace, though we bought several movies that night. When I saw You Can Count On Me, I couldn’t resist. I’d seen it three or four times, and usually that’s enough to convince me to own it. If a movie’s got three or four happy viewings in it, it’s got three or four more at least. I love this movie. I love the no-nonsense approach that Sammy (Linney) takes to her life, and the way the movie quickly unravels her, and then begins the process of sewing her back together. I love the way Terry (Mark Ruffalo), her irresponsible scalawag of a brother, dispenses his own streetwise wisdom that, if you blink, you lose in his sometimes angry, always rambling speeches. But mostly I love the differences in the way each of them interact with Sammy’s son, Rudy (Rory Culkin). Sammy is a single mother; Terry is the out-of-nowhere uncle/stranger. Sammy wants to shape her son into a man she can be proud of; Terry simply wants to know him. Sammy is amused by the sometimes grown-up way her son speaks; Terry either doesn’t notice or doesn’t care that Rudy is a child, and talks to him, most of the time, as if he were simply a smaller adult. For example:
Terry, on the other hand, is as much of a child (or as much of an adult) as Rudy is:
When I was Rudy’s age, nobody ever talked to me like this. It didn’t matter that I didn’t know that I wanted them to, or that they didn’t know it either. The movie is about a hundred different things — the choices that a single mother makes, the repercussions of severe loss at an early age, the various ways that people go astray and wander back on course — but for me it’s mostly about a boy who is somehow wiser than the two most important figures in his life, both of whom are reduced at times to little more than children themselves.
The movie is all of the things I love about small movies: quietly paced, populated with familiar people who behave like we might behave ourselves, and who are stuck in the same holes that real people are. It asks big questions, and shows how ineffective our answers are, and how little we know about what we believe and feel. It spits and crackles with real emotion, isn’t going for laughs or tears it hasn’t earned, and never comes full circle, though it makes a valiant effort, and ends up a pleasantly wobbly oval that doesn’t quite close just right. Comment on this entry |
![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() ![]() ![]() | ||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||